One of my toughest
research projects has been my 3rd great grandfather, William Henry Harrison
Edmondson (1818-1891). The sheer number of Edmondson's located in the south and
mid-west is staggering, so tracing the right person has been like untangling those
dreaded Christmas lights. The names of his parents were included in research
gifted to me, but having scoured much of the online resources available, as
well as combining DNA evidence, I saw nothing to contradict the information I
had. For years I worked this line and made great progress. I found land records
that revealed William's wife's maiden name and family. I had located William's
date of death and grave. I felt confident in how my Edmondson line was
supported. Until 2 weeks ago that is.
![]() |
Edmondson children: Laura Opal (my great grandmother), Loretta Violet, Myrtle holding Edna and Elvis, unknown, Carl, Arthur, and unknown |
A comment was made
on an 1856 New Madrid, Missouri deed that I had uploaded for William. It was
rather abrupt and just stated that the William Henry Harrison Edmondson, child
of John Edmondson and Drelinder Norris, actually lived most of his life in Indiana
and went by Henry H Edmondson. Huh? Who was this person and what information
did they have? I immediately sent a reply politely stating that obviously we
had a conflict in information, but I would love to collaborate and figure things
out. Nothing. No response. I dug around and found this user's tree, wasn't
initially impressed with the information, so went about re-looking at my own
sources to confirm their solidity.
And in looking at my
file with slightly more jaded, experienced eyes, I began to realize that my own
claim was at best very circumstantial. Then I looked at the 1870 Federal Census
tied to this “impostor”. There he was, living with his family in Indiana…
including his sister, Nancy Edmondson Nunnamaker… who I had independently
confirmed in my own tree as being a valid child of John and Drelinder
Edmondson. Ruh-Roh Shaggy. I had a problem. It appeared that my 3rd great grandfather may be the
“impostor”. I had to delete the
connection between my William Henry Harrison Edmondson and the parents I had
recorded in my tree until further information could be found. It was time to rework this file.
In my early days as
a genealogist, I made a multitude of beginner mistakes: too trusting of other's
online trees, not citing my sources, not keeping a research log. I've spent a lot of time
combing through my original work trying to fix poorly supported research, come
to appreciate the value of sound research methods, and ultimately how to be a
better genealogist. Reminders of my "enthusiastic" beginnings still
come up from time to time, but I also must remember that even when practicing
sound research techniques, mistakes can still happen.
The hardest part of
this whole experience? I really dislike being wrong. Especially when I work so
hard to be accurate. And since I have a public tree, how many people trusted my
information to be accurate? Yes, every tree needs to be treated with a grain of
salt and independently researched, but with the saturation of copy and paste
trees out there, how many times had MY potentially inaccurate information been spread
around? I hang my head in shame and finally understand the impulse to make all
of my research private so I don’t perpetuate, even inadvertently, the spread of
inaccurate information.
So now what? I take
a deep breath, accept that mistakes happen, and correct what I can. For those
that I know might have this information in their tree, I make personal contact
and advise them of the issue. I continue to research and hope that I will eventually
break through this new brick wall. Based on the dna evidence, I suspect I will
return to this line, just by a different route. And finally, I take a bite of
my humble pie, and send a thank you note to the user who brought this whole
issue to light.